After almost a century, wolves have come home to California.
On August 20, 2015, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) announced that it had photographic evidence from a trail camera that two gray wolf adults and five pups had taken up residence in southeastern Siskiyou County in northern California. It’s the first known pack since the state’s gray wolf population went extinct in 1924.
The CDFW is currently working on a wolf management plan that it hopes to release soon. Open meetings will then be scheduled in order to hear public comments on the plan’s draft. It looks as if there will be some lively discussion; The Sacramento Bee has already reported that the presence of wolves in the state is causing “hunters and ranchers [to] cringe.”
With the old and untrue fears about wolves already being manifest in the state and in light of Congress’s current attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA), will California wolves even have a chance to be “managed”?
Fractured fairy tales
Wolves lived in California for thousands of years before they were extirpated in the early 1900s. It wasn’t until December 2011 that another wolf—called OR7 or Journey—was found wandering in northeastern California. State biologists suspected that OR7, seen on a trail cam, had left his pack in northeastern Oregon to find a mate. He roamed California for more than a thousand miles before returning to Oregon near the California border in March 2013. Now, he is alpha male of the Rogue Pack in southern Oregon.
State biologists suspect that one of the adults shown in the August 2015 photos is the same wolf sighted in California in early May this year. An Idaho lab is testing DNA samples from the new wolves, named the “Shasta Pack” due to their proximity to Mount Shasta, to trace their bloodlines and determine if they are in any way related to OR7.
While conservationists, environmentalists and wolf-watchers are excited about the return of wolves to the state, there are some who fear that it may result in negative consequences. In an article in the Inquisitr in April 2014, ranch owners in Siskiyou County expressed concern about the possibility of wolves killing livestock. To offset the threat to their livelihoods, the ranchers proposed that the state set up a special fund to compensate them for possible wolf kills.
But supporters of the wolves’ return to California point out that wolf killings of livestock in other states are nearly nonexistent. For example, in Idaho—which currently has a population of more than 700 wolves—a cow has less than one in 21,400 chances of being killed by a wolf. In that state, while wolves kill three or four times more sheep than cattle, the individual probability of a sheep kill is still small: less than one in 500. Even this mortality is offset by decreased predation from coyotes, because where wolves recolonize habitat, coyote numbers usually decrease by 40 to 50 percent.
In June 2014, the California Fish and Game Commission, anticipating that more wolves would migrate into the state, voted to list gray wolves as endangered under the California Endangered Species Act. In addition, wolves in the western United States—except for Idaho, Montana, eastern Oregon and eastern Washington—are listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973.
But with the federal Endangered Species Act threatened by the 114th Congress, how long can we expect California to be able to protect its newly returned wolves?
Act under attack
The Center for Biological Diversity reports that Congress is currently working to erode the federal Endangered Species Act. Riders in unrelated bills have been slipped in, such as an amendment to the Senate Keystone XL pipeline bill that would have made it more difficult and more expensive for citizens to sue to enforce the act. And there is a new movement to appoint politicians—not scientists—to make critical decisions about which species to protect.
When it comes to wolves, there seems to be no middle ground among stakeholders. Ranchers demand the right to protect their herds. Hunters and trappers resent any interference in their annual chances to stalk top predators. Environmentalists and wildlife advocates, believing that wolves have both an ecological purpose and an inherent right to exist, fight to give a native species the opportunity to recover in as much of its former habitat as possible.
Do you think that the wolves returning to California have a fighting chance of repopulating the state, or are they already doomed?
Here’s to finding your true places and natural habitats,
Hurray for the wolves!
I just finished _Badluck Way_ by Bryce Andrews, a fairly balanced discussion by someone who was in the middle of wolves and livestock.
Giving the wolves to repopulate will help and benefit us the more and not doing so we are loosing as they play an important role in the ecosystem so i think the congress should understand this.
Hopefully the wolves have an opportunity to thrive and be managed to provide an important ecological function.
I hope that that the people on California give them a chance to return. Perhaps putting limits on the number and areas where they can live without persecution, may allow a careful coexistence.
California has plenty of remote places that wolves can inhabit. It’s highly unlikely that we might see them spread all across the state but I believe that northern California and maybe south(if mexican wolves migrate there) have a good enough chance.
I would love to get wolves back in the UK… but it seems an almost impossible dream. Californians should fight to protect this incredible species, because it is a privilege not an inconvenience to see them return.
I think the wolves that are returning to California don’t have a chance, in ####, of repopulating that state. Most people have proven that they grew up believing that the wolf was a ruthless killing machine and they will not accept the wolf as a important part of nature.
We Need a Sanctuary And I Would Love to Run It!
The wolves will survive provided that hunters do not decide that they want to take them out.
Protection of endangered species should be paramount for both government and state.
Without natural wildlife the world is a much poorer place.
Thanks for your article. We own approx. 1,700 acres in northernmost Shasta County. Predators are an essential part of a healthy ecosystem. Even though it would be a very small part of a wolf’s home range, they are welcome on our land should they or their offspring move south.