“Going Rogue” for the National Park Service, Science and Trees

Candice Gaukel Andrews May 16, 2017 7

It’s believed employees and/or supporters of South Dakota’s Badlands National Park recently started the Alt National Park Service social media accounts. ©Joel Henner, flickr

Going rogue. Since 1835, that phrase has been used to describe elephants that exhibit violent behavior, whether through injury or from being separated from their herd. Decades later, when applied to humans, the term came to denote conduct that was erratic or dangerous.

Today, however, when it’s said that someone is going rogue, it usually means that a person is going to stop following orders, display some degree of independence or fail to follow an expected script. And from the Alt National Park Service to the Ungagged EPA, it seems we’re now awash in government employees, scientists and even private citizens who are taking environmental matters into their own hands in uncommon ways.

But are these modern aberrants really so atypical? Perhaps not—if we look all the way back to the 1960s.

Tree transplanters

A family-run nonprofit called Archangel Ancient Tree Archive is working to preserve some of the world’s oldest and largest living plants. ©Jason Hollinger, flickr

The monumental coast redwoods that range from the alluvial plains of California’s Humboldt County down to the fog-shrouded valleys of Big Sur have inspired human beings since the dawn of time. Words such as ancient, immense, magnificent, mysterious and stately barely begin to encapsulate their beauty and power.

From a seed measuring no bigger than one from a tomato, a California coast redwood may grow to a height of 379 feet and have a width of 29 feet at its base. Fossil records show that relatives of these giants thrived in the Jurassic Period almost 200 million years ago. Today, California’s North Coast provides one of the few environments in the world suited for the trees. Here, a combination of climate, elevation and longitude allows the redwoods to live within a few hundred coastal miles. The cool, moist air created by the Pacific Ocean keeps the trees continually damp, even during summer droughts.

The trees have a lot going for them. Resistance to natural enemies, such as insects and fire, are built-in features. The high tannin content of the wood keeps insect damage to insignificant levels, and thick bark and foliage that rests high above the ground provide protection from all but the hottest fires. However, the threats of deforestation and climate change are taking a toll. In the United States, only 5 percent of the old-growth coast redwoods forests remain.

Thick bark provides coast redwoods with protection against fires, but it can’t safeguard the trees from climate change. ©Hitchster, flickr

Coast redwoods live, on average, for a few hundred years, yet there are some that are more than 2,000 years old. No one knows how the trees get so old or what kind of medical value they may have. That’s why the family-run, nonprofit Archangel Ancient Tree Archive is trying to preserve them. Michigan-resident Jake Milarch and his family started Archangel in order to clone the trees’ material for safekeeping and for reforestation elsewhere.

After the organization’s arborists climb the trees to collect genetic material from the branches, they rush the clippings back to Michigan, where they are disinfected and sorted in a lab. Then, using a technique called “micropropagation,” a new seedling is created, an exact DNA replica of its parent. It’s a complicated process that’s taken Archangel’s propagators years of experimentation to perfect. And still, the yield is just 3 to 5 percent.

Archangel has cloned more than 130 species of trees over the years—all of them the oldest and largest of their kind. The hope is to create a “genetic living library” that will preserve these species for future generations.

National Park Service alternative

The Alt National Park Service is using the Internet to “protect and preserve the environment.” ©NPS/Dudley Edmondson, flickr

Other rogue environment supporters and “official” environmental groups eschew physical tree branches for metaphorical webs. The Alt National Park Service is an example.

Recently, when the new administration ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Interior Department—which oversees the National Park Service—to limit contact with the public, including bans on social media postings, National Park Service employees and/or supporters responded by creating a social media identity called the “Alt National Park Service.” Ostensibly endorsed by Arches, Badlands, Everglades, Grand Canyon, Great Smoky Mountains, Shenandoah, Yellowstone and Yosemite National Parks and the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Alt National Park Service stated in one of its first online messages: “You can shut down the use of our social media accounts, but you cannot shut down the Internet or take control of what we do with our personal time. We only wish to protect and preserve the environment for future generations to come.”

Now, several accounts related to—but not directly affiliated with—the Environmental Protection Agency, such as Ungagged EPA and Stuff EPA Would Say, list similar missions: to “flood the Web with real climate facts.”

For many years, toxic metals from zinc smelters near Pennsylvania’s Blue Mountain destroyed the surrounding vegetation, creating soil erosion. The zinc smelters have closed, the area is now an EPA Superfund site and local flora is recovering. ©Nicholas A. Tonelli, flickr

Scientists united

While it’s tempting to think that working outside the traditional circles of science is an artifact of the past six months, there is actually a precedent that dates back to the late 1960s.

In 1969, the Vietnam War was at its height. It was also the year that Cleveland’s heavily polluted Cuyahoga River caught fire. Appalled at how the U.S. government was misusing science, scientists and students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology drafted a statement calling for scientific research to be directed away from military technologies and put toward solving pressing environmental and social problems. Their group, the Union of Concerned Scientists, is still going strong today.

While it’s disheartening to hear that arborists, government scientists, park rangers and even institutions of higher learning have to “go rogue” occasionally in service of the truth, it is comforting to know that history shows that they—like the elephants—will, when the times call for it.

Here’s to finding your true places and natural habitats,



  1. Russell Donnelly July 6, 2017 at 8:27 am - Reply

    The environmental agencies of this Nation are there for a very specific reason – to protect Human Health; Welfare; Safety; and the Environment – ; not for any other reason. The laws and regulations provide a “checks and balances” system to put a leash on unbridled Corporate Machine enterprise. Clean Air. Clean Land, and Clean Water are MAGNITUDES MORE IMPORTANT THAN CAPITAL GAIN !!! We all need supply and demand; but; not at the expense of life supporting Natural Resources and Natural Order Function on our planet home ! Humankind are pushing this planet past recovery ! We must fully maintain our protective agencies; even if this is inconvenient for Corporate Machine Progress ! Currently most of our agencies’ true Administrators and Scientists are systematically being culled and removed in lieu of corporate friendly personnel. THIS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED !!!

  2. James Van Slyck MBA CMC June 27, 2017 at 1:34 pm - Reply

    Times are changing. China’s auto production is roughly equal to the car production if United States and Japan combined. The American auto industry has supported our living standard.

  3. Barbara Rosensteel June 27, 2017 at 1:33 pm - Reply

    I respectfully disagree with Norman McLeod’s statement that these employees are “gnawing at the fabric of the institutions that pay their mortgages, put food on the table, and provide them career tracks that are often far better than they will ever be able to do once they are out of government”. Just the opposite, in fact: They are defending the mission and work of their agencies and organizations against the misguided (to be kind) “leaders” who are “gnawing at the fabric of the institutions” these people work within and to whose missions they are devoted. They are saving and releasing data, scientific work and documents that were paid for by taxpayer dollars and are in the public domain (or should be), but which they believe (or know) are in danger of being destroyed or hidden by the current Administration.

  4. Bob Holderness-Roddam June 21, 2017 at 10:43 pm - Reply

    ‘Rogue’ is not the word I would use – I’d reserve that for Trump and his cohort who are, quite frankly, endangering the future of biodiversity on this planet. The employees are demonstrating commendable courage and ethics in their activities. In my home, Australia, we are also battling dinosaurs who would return us to their time, over 60,000,000 years ago.

  5. Oscar Murga June 13, 2017 at 8:14 am - Reply

    Shows, in my humble opinion, a very good sense of responsibility and coherence with their commitment…Good for all of them…

  6. Paige Buck June 7, 2017 at 8:04 am - Reply

    I suppose most of the conservationists, soil scientists, and passionate employees I’ve enjoyed working alongside for the past 30 years would be considered ‘rogue.’ They love what they do. They do it on & off the clock. When they retire, they will still do it. It’s part of who they are. And every person they interact with gets a little bit passed along to them. Hopefully, it’s a sustainable situation!

  7. Norman MacLead June 7, 2017 at 8:03 am - Reply

    Is the phenomenon of government employees “going rogue” a sign of unprecedented, troubled times? Troubled, yes . . . unprecedented, certainly not. It’s something that has happened over and over and over again throughout human history, starting with the first civilizations, and arguably even before then.

    It’s not the agencies that are “going rogue” . . . it’s a number of government employees and their allies. The employees involved know full well that they are not only violating agency policy, but also that in many cases they are violating multiple statutes, rules, regulations, and agency directives in the process of doing so. That’s one reason why they resort to encrypted communications.

    Whatever “good” these people may feel they are doing, they are gnawing at the fabric of the institutions that pay their mortgages, put food on the table, and provide them career tracks that are often far better than they will ever be able to do once they are out of government.

Leave A Response »